Home    Proofreading    Proofreading for International Students    Editing    Rewriting    Copywriting    E-book conversion   
Enquiry Form    Testimonials    Blogspot    UK–US English    Contact Us   

WriteItClearly.com

We make words work for you

Call: +44(0)1483 836124
Email: enquiries@writeitclearly.com

WriteItClearly.com writing, editing and proofreading services

BlogSpot

BlogSpot List

Can you spot the problem with this headmaster's letter?

by: Marilyn Owen (16 December 2014)

The headmaster at my granddaughter’s school has sent parents and guardians an urgent email. It states that a child at the school suffers from an extreme allergy to beans; that the teachers have decided that the school will become a bean-free zone; and asks parents not to send any beans into school in their child’s lunchboxes.

Fair enough – not many of us are likely to send any beans anyway! However, the following sentence says: “This means that we have substituted beans on the school menu for alternative choices.”

First, when reading this sentence I thought – wait, this is wrong! How do I rephrase this? I then realised that it was just one small word that was wrong – one little preposition. If we just replaced “for” with “with” the whole sentence would convey the meaning that was actually intended by the head teacher!

The sentence would then read: “This means that we have substituted beans on the school menu with alternative choices.”

That is the difference one little preposition can make – and why even head teachers could sometimes do with a proofreader!

 

Views: 1892

Other articles on Proofreading and Communication and language

Some related articles

The 'Apostrophiser' gets it right   Wrong 'Hail Mary' finds its way into Sri Lankan hymn book   Morrissey's first book slammed  

BlogSpot List


Comments...

Ref: 143 No, it may well be a deliberate error on the part of the headteacher to make people read the letters properly!
Marilyn - 10:42 17-12-2014
Ref: 142 Who puts beans in their kid's lunchbox??
Romany - 09:55 17-12-2014
Ref: 141 Is it laziness of thought, an error of understanding, or a grammatical mistake imported from abroad?
Garry - 09:19 17-12-2014

Leave your comment

* Mandatory field

Username
(choose one or use your existing username) *:
Email address (enter your email address) *:
Your Comment *:
Enter security code:
cypher

Home    Our Services    About Us    Blog    Links    Enquiry Form   

© WriteItClearly.com 2006–2019